The bet is based on chance. That is why it is necessary for both sides to have an equal chance of winning and for both sides to have the opportunity to win or lose. Agreements that fix results on a party do not bet an agreement. There must be two results of the event and a fair chance will be given to the parties. If winning or losing is entirely based on skill, there is no bet. If one of the parties has the power to influence the outcome of the bet, the agreement will miss an essential element of a bet, as stated in the case of Dayabhai Tribhovandas v Lakshmichand (1885). A betting contract or contract is for two persons who agree to express opposing views, which relate to the issue of a particular future event, agree to pay or transfer money to it or somewhere else, depending on the impact of that event; There is no answer to an action by the broker with respect to such a claim against its principle that; For the defendant, he entered into the contract as a bet with the intention of paying only the differences; and that the plaintiff must have known of the defendant`s inability to enter into the contracts through payments and deliveries, given his position and means. This is what distinguishes an insurance contract from a bet. Any insurance contract requires, for its validity, the existence of an insurable interest. Insurance without insurable interest is nothing more than a betting contract and therefore not aeig.  “insurable interest,” the risk of loss to which the insured is likely to be exposed as a result of the insured event. Literally, the word “bets” means that something is lost or won, and therefore betting agreements are nothing but ordinary betting agreements. Section 30 of the Indian Contracts Act refers to betting contracts called “betting agreements are not concluded.” The section does not define “betting that..” Section 30 states that “the agreements as a bet are not concluded; and there are no lawsuits to recover something that is supposedly won on a bet or entrusted to a person to respect the outcome of a game or other uncertain event on which a bet is made. Accordingly, it should be noted that the contracts entered into by the applicant with the third parties on behalf of the defendant were betting contracts between the applicant and those third parties.
 Illustration A cricket match begins in Delhi between India and Australia. If India wins the match, Pallav agrees to pay Nishant Rs. 2000, while if Australia wins the match, Nishant agrees to pay the Rs. 2000 in Pallav. The third most important feature of the betting contract is that the event may be uncertain, but should not be a future event. The parties can bet on the qualities or attributes of existing things, or the result of events that have already occurred, they do not know these things.